Case studies
Operating evidence from BergLabs delivery decks.
These case studies use the metrics and scope stated in BergLabs delivery material. Proposal-only engagements are labelled as scope, not outcomes.
- 01ScopeWhat was agreed
- 02DeliveryBergFlow, BergAuto, pod
- 03MetricMeasured or stated
- 04Approved cutClient-approved, anonymised
Scope → Delivery → Metric → Approved cutScope-only cards say so
- Anonymised
Clients appear by description, never by name.
- Sourced
Every metric comes from delivery material.
- Labelled
Scope-only engagements say so.
Featured case
Case 19: hybrid AI-human annotation.
An e-commerce marketplace had scaled annotation by adding people until coordination ate the capacity. BergLabs rebuilt the work as a loop: BergAuto pre-annotates and scores, BergFlow routes the uncertain items to people, and QC samples every batch.
All cases
Filter by the service behind the result.
Five cases from delivery decks and eight from the BergLabs case compendium.
Showing 13 cases
-
India’s largest e-retail platform
Search relevance and catalogue correction
46% → 26%search pain, before and after2.5M+ query-product pairs labelled and 1.2M+ catalogue errors corrected. The source deck states a $15M+ annual revenue lift.
Ask for the full case Outcome -
India’s top travel platform
Property content accuracy
8%increase in property bookings98% property-detail accuracy and a 12% improvement in content quality score.
Ask for the full case Outcome -
India’s largest seller aggregator
Seller onboarding QC as a managed queue
50%increase in seller approval rates80% reduction in QC turnaround time and a 9% uplift in seller NPS.
Ask for the full case Outcome -
Large manual annotation programme
Confidence-gated annotation at scale
30%faster turnaround15% cost savings at 96% accuracy, with a confidence threshold above 0.9 deciding what reached human review.
Ask for the full case Outcome -
Global payments network
Reconciliation and dispute workflows
30 dayspilot window, scope not outcomeReconciliation and dispute workflows scoped for a 30-day pilot. This card describes the agreed scope only.
Ask for the full case Scope only -
Case 08 · Multimodal production
Multimodal production at industrial scale
5 Mn+annotations a week at peak on BergFlowVideo, lidar and audio annotated across 80+ task types, with provenance on every frame.
Ask for the full case Outcome -
Case 12 · Two hospital groups
AI search visibility, 25 questions, four engines
90 / 74appearances in 100 AI answersTwo hospital groups, published under the pseudonyms Apollonia and Manilla, compared across four answer engines.
Ask for the full case Outcome -
Case 17 · Marketplace catalogue
Catalogue QC before listings go live
Mechanism case: how the workflow runs, without a published metric.Attribute and image checks run on BergAuto, with exceptions reviewed in BergFlow before a listing is published.
Ask for the full case Mechanism -
Case 18 · Search relevance
One rubric for query-product relevance
Mechanism case: how the workflow runs, without a published metric.Query-product pairs judged against one rubric, with disputed pairs escalated to a senior reviewer.
Ask for the full case Mechanism -
Case 09 · Agent management
Agents with bounded authority
Mechanism case: how the workflow runs, without a published metric.Each agent acts inside a defined limit; anything beyond it waits for a named approver.
Ask for the full case Mechanism -
Case 04 · Voice collections
Payment-promise calls with a human route
Mechanism case: how the workflow runs, without a published metric.A voice agent handles payment-promise calls; disputes and hardship cases are routed to a person.
Ask for the full case Mechanism -
Case 24 · Document intake
Document intake with a solo reviewer
Mechanism case: how the workflow runs, without a published metric.Extraction and checks are automated so one reviewer clears the exceptions, with the evidence attached.
Ask for the full case Mechanism
Proposal-only engagements are labelled as scope, not outcomes. Client names are withheld; each client is described by sector and scale.
How to read these cases
What a BergLabs case study is, and is not.
Two rules apply to every card on this page.
01Anonymised by description
Named references need client approval, so clients appear as “India’s largest e-retail platform” or “a global payments network”, never by name.
02Scope is not an outcome
Engagements at proposal or pilot stage describe what was agreed. They carry a Scope label and no result.
Questions
Questions about the case studies
Anonymity, sources and scope.
Case studies
Why are clients anonymised?
Named references require client approval for publication. Each case describes the client by sector and scale instead.
Where do the metrics come from?
From the work itself. Some figures were measured by BergLabs during the engagement; others are stated in client or delivery reports. Each card says which.
What does scope, not outcome, mean?
Some engagements are at proposal or pilot stage. Those cards describe the scope agreed, not a result.
How long has the team been doing this work?
The team has run managed data and operations work since 2022 under Berg Technologies; BergLabs was founded in 2025.
How do I find a case like ours?
Filter by service above, or tell us the workflow and we will share the closest case and how it ran.
Measure your own workflow next.
Every case here started as one workflow and a pilot. Bring yours, and we will agree the metric before we start.